![]() |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||
November 7, 2003 - Response to recent Letters to the Editor of the Salem NewsTo the Editor: I write in response to a number of letters to the editor that have recently been published in your newspaper regarding the closing of St. Mary’s Parish, Salem. In many instances, the spurious charge has been leveled that the Archdiocese of Boston closed St. Mary’s Parish in order to be able to sell the property and pay off the legal settlement arising from the clergy abuse crisis. The facts say otherwise. St. Mary’s Parish was closed in January 2003 after a long process. In 1999, the pastors of the Salem cluster recommended that St. Mary’s be closed, but a later decision was made to delay the process. In October 2001, two months prior to the onset of the sexual abuse crisis in January 2002, Fr. Keohan, the pastor of St. Mary’s, came before the Archdiocesan Presbyteral Council to discuss the closing of the parish. The reasons at the time for this discussion, and the eventual reasons for the closing of St. Mary’s Church were clearly laid out: the fact that there were over seven Catholic churches that served the city of Salem, much too may for the present needs of the Catholic population; the reality of the decrease in the number of priests available to serve in these parishes; the fact that number of parishioners, baptisms, weddings, and funerals had dropped dramatically in St. Mary’s Parish over a number of years; and the reality that the weekly parish collection could no longer meet the financial needs of the parish. The process of closing the parish continued over the course of 2002 with no positive signs of things getting any better in the parish. By way of example, in the final year (July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002) of statistics available on St. Mary’s, there were only 13 baptisms and 3 weddings in the parish. While the small community that remained at St. Mary’s was a vibrant and faithful group, the realities that the Church faced did not allow for the Archdiocese to continue to maintain the parish. It is absolutely understandable that members of that community would be and continue to be upset and hurt at the loss of their parish. While this letter may not eliminate those feelings, I hope it, at least, clarifies this matter for them and for your readers. Reverend Christopher J. Coyne
|
|||||||
|
|||||||